The two maps show how a small town named Islip is planned to change in comparison with its current layout.
It is clear that this Centre’s layout will modify dramatically with more amenities.
Currently, this Centre has a main road running from west to the east, with two short lanes. The lane in the west leads to a school, but at the end of the shorter eastern one is a park. Between those two lanes, there are two ranges of shops along the side of the road, with housing in the south and a countryside area located in the north.
The plan is to totally change its layout in a circular area for pedestrians only, which will be covered by a dual carriageway. Therefore, the countryside and the main road will be eradicated, but the row of shops on its southern side will remain intact. The other side of the old road will witness the construction of a bus station, a shopping centre and a car park respectively from west to east. The school will remain unchanged outside the circle, but a park is planned to be diminished and located inside the pedestrian area. Beside some residential areas that are now exist, there will be a new one on the right of the car park and another on the left of the park.
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines.Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 90
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 73
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines.Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 89
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 574, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...ide some residential areas that are now exist, there will be a new one on the right o...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45739910314 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51602677205 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529147982063 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.393079288 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.4 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131206585343 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594984697655 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774299260911 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104013156957 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102633874683 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.