The maps below show changes to the ground floor plan of a university department in 2000 and 2015

Essay topics:

The maps below show changes to the ground floor plan of a university department in 2000 and 2015

The maps illustrate how the ground floor of a university department changed in two different years of 2000 and 2015.

Overall, more and more buildings serving the educational purpose were constructed .

In 2000, it can be clearly seen that there was a main entrance leading to the complex building. There were only three seminar rooms, two were on the left of the corridor and one was one the other side. The library was between the third room for seminar and an office. A park was created on the right corner of the map.

However, there were some major alterations to the design of the department in 2015 although the entrance and the street remained unchanged. First of all, the office was extended, which covered the old library. The number of seminar rooms increased to five rooms as two more were constructed in the north of the old building. According to the maps, the park had been demolished, and then replaced by a new library and an IT center. It can be noticed that a parking lot was built at the corner of the main entrance and the street.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (13 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-05-31 chathurika2008@gmail.com 70 view
2020-10-05 nquoc25 71 view
2021-10-11 tix2304 89 view
2022-10-30 myduyen282 78 view
2021-10-19 suaadma34 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'illustrate'.
Suggestion: illustrate
The maps illustrates how the ground floor of a university de...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...the educational purpose were constructed . In 2000, it can be clearly seen tha...
^^
Line 7, column 418, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: an; IT
... and then replaced by a new library and an IT center. It can be noticed that a parkin...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 424, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'centers'?
Suggestion: centers
...hen replaced by a new library and an IT center. It can be noticed that a parking lot w...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, then, third, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 873.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64361702128 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47812297403 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.7289437938 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.3636363636 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0909090909 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151815348844 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649177899666 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143335926979 0.0843802449381 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146778433212 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.208639273763 0.0819641961636 255% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.