The maps below show the changes that have taken place in meadowside village and fonton, a neighbouring town since 1962.
The maps illustrate the development takes place in village of meadowside and fonton which is near town, from 1962 to present.
Overall, the meadowside village has been developed faster than fonton. However, the both village and town are mixed with new infrastructure.
In 1962, the both village and town were not have transportation to each other. The meadowside village had road facility through the village which was not to the fonton.The fountain had railway which was cross on outskirt of town. after 1962, the development had taken in meadowside village because of enlarged in size of area and also local business were built such as a housing estate, Leisue complex and super store. As well, road transportation connected to near fonton and which was little extended towards the meadowside village in 1985.
At present, the infrastructure has improved between both village and fonton which have connected the two locations. The mid of meadowside and town have station which is connected the town railway track. In addition, hotel is behind the station, and the opposite to the road has business Park. Nevertheless, the village has developed rapidly compared to the fonton town.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-01-31 | Goldenvikie | 67 | view |
2022-01-25 | Nareia | 73 | view |
2020-02-02 | Chim | 73 | view |
2020-01-20 | pateldhruv1708 | 49 | view |
2019-11-10 | Bhanu Kishore | 68 | view |
- The chart below give information about the levels of education in Glasgow, a city in Scotland, in 2010 56
- children should learn to speak a foreign language as soon as they start School how can do you agree with this proposal how important is it for a child to learn a foreign language. 56
- the pie chart below shows where energy is used in typed Australian household and the table shows the amount of electricity used according to the number of occupants summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 78
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place in meadowside village and fonton a neighbouring town since 1962 68
- The graph below shows the population change between 1940 and 2000 in three different counties in the U.S. state of Oregon. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 45, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...962, the both village and town were not have transportation to each other. The meado...
^^^^
Line 9, column 169, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...the village which was not to the fonton.The fountain had railway which was cross o...
^^^
Line 9, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h was not to the fonton.The fountain had railway which was cross on outskirt of t...
^^
Line 9, column 232, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
...ay which was cross on outskirt of town. after 1962, the development had taken in mead...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ons. The mid of meadowside and town have station which is connected the town rail...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, nevertheless, so, well, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1007.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2722513089 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76850995134 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513089005236 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2776255522 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5454545455 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3636363636 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357201846105 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15720039315 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788335031825 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250571614778 0.15604864568 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539512428568 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.