The maps below show the changes that have taken place at queen mary hospital since its construction in 1960.
Thr diagrammatic representation depicts how much development occured at queen mary hospital between 1960 and 2000.
Overall, it can be manifested that the hospital under went significant refurbishment and other hospital facilities wad developed at the expense of shopping centre and farmland.
To commence with, the shopping centre which was adjacent to main road in the left side was converted to cancer centre and pharmacy store in 1980. The nursing school wad constructed in the place of farmland which was located left corner opposite to the main road. Both hospital and carpark remain untouched during 1960-1980.
Moreover, in 2000,the cancer centre which at left side opposite to the main road undergoes expansion in size dramatically. The nursing school's size reduced substantially to provide space for cancer centre. The alloted car park area wad decreased to almost less than half as compared to the year 1980. The pharmacy store and hospital remained un changed in the year between 1980 and 2000.
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at queen mary hospital since its construction in 1960 78
- The maps show improvements that have been made to a university campus between 2010 and the present day 60
- The charts below give information about levels of education in Glasgow a city in scotland in 2010 67
- The chart below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinion of full time and part time students about its services 73
- The graph shows data on the manufacture of passenger cars in 2015 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 49, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: underwent
... it can be manifested that the hospital under went significant refurbishment and other hos...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... converted to cancer centre and pharmacy store in 1980. The nursing school wad co...
^^
Line 7, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... The alloted car park area wad decreased to almost less than half as compared to ...
^^
Line 7, column 303, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...than half as compared to the year 1980. The pharmacy store and hospital remained un...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.752158244 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.212373122 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1111111111 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7777777778 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.33333333333 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151364527432 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663570414895 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626862802667 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106416678343 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569460907196 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.