The table below depicts the information about the posts held by women in parliament and in management in 5 countries in 2000
The tabular data delineates the percentage of females who had seats in government and in management in Canada, Ukraine, Egypt, Rome and Italy in the year 2000.
Overall, it can be manifested that the Canada was at top position in proportion of women works as government officials. While, in mangement, Rome wad leading.
To commence with, the total number of seats filled by women in Parliament was 54% for Canada which was 2% higher then Egypt(52%). However, both countries Canada and Egypt had similar proportion of women in management department (36%). Italy, in which 40% of government seats are occupied by females but in management, only quarter percentage of women had seats in management.
Secondly, Rome had least proportion of women in Parliament with figures 10%, which was almost less than half of Ukraine(23%). In contrast, the number of seats in management for Ukrainr was 40%, in comparision to Rome, it was 12% less with the figures 52%.
- The table below depicts the information about the posts held by women in parliament and in management in 5 countries in 2000 72
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at queen mary hospital since its construction in 1960 78
- The graph shows data on the manufacture of passenger cars in 2015 65
- The maps show improvements that have been made to a university campus between 2010 and the present day 60
- The chart below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinion of full time and part time students about its services 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n Canada, Ukraine, Egypt, Rome and Italy in the year 2000. Overall, it can be ...
^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'higher than'?
Suggestion: higher than
...liament was 54% for Canada which was 2% higher then Egypt52%. However, both countries Canad...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... was 54% for Canada which was 2% higher then Egypt52%. However, both countries Canad...
^^^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rnment seats are occupied by females but in management, only quarter percentage o...
^^
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the least'.
Suggestion: had the least
...seats in management. Secondly, Rome had least proportion of women in Parliament with ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, secondly, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 799.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05696202532 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77527856736 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563291139241 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8634666713 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.875 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124637719007 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599669485089 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040308556157 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.076029442922 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317490871642 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.