The maps detail Darwin's divergences in the waterfront area of a town from 2009 to 2014. Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the industrial town was emphasized in the figure for environmentally friendly. After 5 years, the school and convention center in the Northwest remained, while the industrial area in a circular place at the center of the town was transformed into a new swimming pool enhanced to 3 pools in Darwins in total ( comprising the bigger figures near the sea). Without the pool, there were not any changed items in the middle circle. To the south of town, an undergraduate building was constructed and it also witnessed the enlargement of resident houses either. The industrial land, which domain a huge area to the south, was replaced by 2 separate forests. At the sea, despite the fishing area following no changed trend through half a decade, in the southeast, a harbor was erected.
- The diagram below shows the development of a particular area between 1965 and the present day 11
- The chart shows the division of household tasks by gender in Great Britain 61
- A survey conducted for the places in which people gain access to the Internet from 1998 to 2004 89
- Some believe technology has made our lives too complex and the solution is to lead a simpler life without technology To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The graph and table give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 460, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... enhanced to 3 pools in Darwins in total comprising the bigger figures near the s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 772.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91719745223 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89070943938 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.643312101911 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.8371792265 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.285714286 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233947208232 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110711955935 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119155448852 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233947208232 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.