The maps below show the changes that took place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and
2005.
The diagram depicts the transformation of the Tampleton recreation area adjacent to sea, comparing the infrastructure of the region in 1990 whit that in 2005.
First of all, the railway line had been extended south-west along the shore, drawing visitors to the resort from south. In the south-east corner planners had constructed the ferry connection as well as built up a new airport with the aim to increase the comfort of travelers commuting to this recreational area.
What is more, planners had introduced a complex of apartment houses on the site that hosted a number of individual houses along the coast west of river. This transformation had ultimately closed the increased appetite of visitors for appealing accommodation options. In addition to aforementioned changes, a cluster of condos opposite to the apartments, a supermarket in a neighborhood area and three more apartment hotels besides the lake were situated in the resort.
To summarize, after these infrastructural changes implementation, the needs of visitors were better served meeting the demand for new accommodation, travel ports and supermarkets.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-29 | hoang tuan minh | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-13 | minhngoc_8 | 61 | view |
| 2022-04-13 | minhngoc_8 | 61 | view |
| 2022-04-13 | minhngoc_8 | 61 | view |
| 2022-04-13 | minhngoc_8 | 61 | view |
- The charts below show the proportions of the world s oil resources held in different areas together with the proportions consumed annually in the same areas 78
- The chart below shows the changes in car ownership in Great Britain between 1961 and 2001 78
- the two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 78
- The maps below show the changes that took place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, so, well, in addition, as well as, first of all, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48275862069 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32078494192 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64367816092 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5187019312 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.285714286 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.23603664747 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0572121674356 0.215688989381 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0259642160634 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0273194507041 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0386736125351 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250123389636 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.