The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam
The mapping pictures depict a number of significant changes which took place after removing some constructions. One of the most prominent projects was the construction of a hydroelectric dam.
From the maps, the most obvious feature was the appearance of a large lake. In addition, there were buildings that had been removed
In 1990, the land for irrigation had been replaced by electric posts. Furthermore, the appearance of a large lake for entertainment and a dam shortened the river's length. And the location of the ancient architecture had disappeared and the place where it was in 2010 became a wasteland. And in 2010 a big hotel appeared next to the lake
Looking at the maps in more detail, the area for rare plants and animals had disappeared and was replaced by a dense wall of pillars. Meanwhile, the villages still existed but had been relocated from afar in the east to beside the river
- The advantages of the spread of English as a global language will continue to outweigh its disadvantages To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road cause some problems What are the problems What are the solutions 56
- Students leave high school without learning how to manage their money What are the reasons and solutions for this issue 61
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that government should have the responsibility To what extend do you agree or disagree 56
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country What are the reasons Solutions to change negative attitudes 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'rivers'' or 'river's'?
Suggestion: rivers'; river's
...r entertainment and a dam shortened the rivers length. And the location of the ancient...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, so, still, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 758.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92207792208 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90796012346 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597402597403 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0596052608 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.75 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116044532532 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556231347774 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744349821998 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.080916196773 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109509207337 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.