The maps illustrate the layout of Colwich Arts Centre between 2005 and at present.
The maps illustrate the layout of Colwich Arts Centre between 2005 and at present.
Overall, Colwich Arts Centre has undergone several alterations including the merger between two gallery rooms, the division of the meeting room, the renovation of wasteland, and the establishment of new function areas. These developments have transformed the art centre into a more space-effective to serve more visitors.
On the left-hand side of the centre, the meeting room has been divided into two rooms that now are found at the former site of the snack bar. In 2005 the cinema and concert hall were conducted in the same room, there are now two separate areas. Furthermore, the cinema has been narrowed leaving more space for a new central exhibition area. Whereas the toilet has been relocated to the right-hand side, the new drama studio has been added at the back of the centre which adjoining new meeting room 1.
It can be seen from the maps that two gallery rooms on the right-hand side have been merged into one big room and moved to the opposite side, while the café shop is now seen next to the new gallery room. The wasteland, which dominated outside the art centre in 2005, has been renovated with a new stage and area for outdoor exhibition and performance.
- Some people think that liking your job is more important than how much money you earn while others think that your salary is more important than how much you like your job Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Some people think that good health is very important to every person so medical service should not be run by profit making companies Do the advantages of private health care outweigh the disadvantages 72
- 3 11
- The maps below show Colwick Arts Centre in 2005 and today 78
- The table illustrates the percentages of three age groups of spectators watching different TV programs 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1056.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.866359447 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55490786641 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52534562212 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7734625798 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.333333333 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281698752914 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173699667779 0.103423049105 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.296058326009 0.0843802449381 351% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.334601258598 0.15604864568 214% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.386359012462 0.0819641961636 471% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.