social media
These days, online conversations using social media apps such as Facebook, Twitter and Skype is replacing face-to-face contact. While it is argued that this development has both benefits and drawbacks, I would believe that the disadvantages are much more considerable.
In terms of the advantages, social networking site has made it much more easier to maintain current relationships and build new connections. In the past, when our relatives or friend lived far apart from us, we were likely to lose their contact. Nowadays, with the help of social media, we can maintain our current relationship by chatting or using video call features of Skype, Facebook or other apps anytime and anywhere. Take my mom as an example, when I were in the field trip, she could use video call features of Viber to keep in touch with me and find my up-to-date information through my status on Facebook. Moreover, we can build new connections sharing the same interest by searching hashtags and even more in the thread's comments or topics related to our interests.
However, I believe that the negative consequences of this development far eclipse its positive impacts discussed above. First, social networking sites are attracting more and more users from different age groups. Although they have some rules to restrict them to some inappropriate content, they still can make up their ages to create an account and watch it. Second, social networking websites can become a toxic environment giving their users a right to assault and bully others, because they are hiding behind the screen and not responsible for their hateful and abusive comments. Third, overuse of social media to communicate leads to a decrease in the quality of communication. Many people are addicted to social media, they tend to build a spectacular profile to connect and keep chatting with strangers instead of talking to their family members or friends in real life. Therefore, they are no longer have real-life circles of friends or even losing their supportive relationships which are the fabric of society.
To conclude, my view is that the benefits offered by social networking sites are undeniable yet outweighed by the disadvantages including inappropriate contents, cyberbullying, and the fragmented society mentioned above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-11 | vuhongminh | 61 | view |
| 2024-09-24 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
| 2024-09-18 | Meomeo11 | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-13 | Tuan Harry | 84 | view |
| 2024-07-16 | MEBC Class | 70 | view |
- The table illustrates the percentages of three age groups of spectators watching different TV programs 67
- Children benefit more from playing outdoors with other children than from playing computer games indoors on their own To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 80
- ETHANOL FUEL IS GENERATED BY CORN
- The table illustrates the percentages of three age groups of spectators watching different TV programs 67
- The table illustrates the percentages of three age groups of spectators watching different TV programs 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...social networking site has made it much more easier to maintain current relationships and b...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, third, while, apart from, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1933.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26702997275 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91096181163 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588555858311 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4917549906 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.866666667 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4666666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261139471644 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950664154058 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110673771692 0.0667982634062 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155043329483 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496896146052 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.