Many people around the world use social media to keep in touch with other people and get the news. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Harnessing alternative forms of social media to stay connected with relatives and access current events has increasingly become prevalent in recent years. Despite some downsides, I contend that the advantages of this tendency surpass its drawbacks for the following reasons.
Admittedly, this trend can pose a threat to a long-lasting relationship among individuals. The inadequate direct interactions stemming from online conversations through social platforms can emerge as an obstacle to separating people. This is because most people often value face-to-face conversations where body language and facial expressions play an important role in enhancing trust and sincerity. If trust cannot be constantly built up, the chance of falling apart is considerably high. As a result, the lack of face-to-face interactions can put an end to a relationship.
Nevertheless, social platforms have offered individuals a superior medium of communication and staying informed about the latest social transformations. First and foremost, the rapid pace of technological advancements has prompted conversations to be commenced through a screen, reducing the need for time-consuming interactions. As a result, individuals can make use of their time more effectively in performing other daily tasks. Additionally, alternative forms of social media can allow people to stay connected with the instantaneous breaking news, enriching their background knowledge. This immediacy likely helps individuals steer clear of potential threats from unanticipated changes in society, safeguarding their lives.
In conclusion, although the utilization of social media in getting news updates and staying connected with other people can potentially obsolete relationships among people, I argue that the advantages far outweigh the downsides. Thanks to immediacy and time efficiency, it is more convenient for people to interact with others and stay informed of societal changes, benefiting their survival.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-13 | Tuan Harry | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that rich countries should provide poorer countries with help that is not financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In many countries the level of crime is increasing What do you think are the main causes of crime What can we deal with those causes 87
- All education and healthcare should be funded by the government and free for everyone To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Research indicates that nowadays some consumers are much less influenced by advertising than in the past What do you think are the reasons for this Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any releva 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...n recent years. Despite some downsides, I contend that the advantages of this ten...
^
Line 7, column 174, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...ly obsolete relationships among people, I argue that the advantages far outweigh ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, so, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.02826855124 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38765888057 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621908127208 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8411863246 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.857142857 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92857142857 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182750702474 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602687154537 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519319104903 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118834011111 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573136176551 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.69 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.