The maps show the village park 10 years ago and the village car park now.
The two diagrams highlight major changes which have taken place in Village Park in the last ten years. Overall, the whole village has experienced a significant modernization and become much more crowded than before.
As for the outside of the Village Park, although the entrance is still in the same position with ten years ago, a new cycle path has been constructed surround the village. The location of the tennis courts also stays unchanged, but there is a double increase in the number of courts. The football pitch and the car park both have been enlarged, especially the car park now can be used for 50 people instead of 20.
Moreover, the woods have been demolished and replaced by new facilities including toilets and cafe. A children's park and a children's soft play area have been built in the place which used to belong to children's play area. Finally, the pound in the bottom of the map has been converted into a boating lake and a total new picnic area has been erected.
- Some people think the news has no connection to people s lives so it is a waste of time to read the news in the newspaper and watch television news programmes To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- It is better for students to live away from home while studying at university than living with parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- The two pictures show the changes of buildings in Liberton Doc's between 1980 and present. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The maps show the village park 10 years ago and the village car park now 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, moreover, so, still, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 816.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71676300578 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45681740316 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606936416185 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.3186391451 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270699381105 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995435858591 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897608820783 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176711693951 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10107200136 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.