The map depicts how the village park has been modernized over the course of ten years.
Overall, the local park has witnessed significant changes, the most prominent of which is the downsizing of the football pitch as well as a range of new recreational and convenient equipment. It is also noticeable that most of the properties have not been relocated over the decade.
As per the maps, a cycle path has been constructed which wraps around the area. Within the town, there have been significant expansions to the car park and the tennis courts in opposition to the footballing area. To be more specific, the former can accommodate 30 more cars and the latter allow four groups of players to enjoy this recreational activity simultaneously instead of the initial two courts. In addition, aligned itself with the permanent children’s play area is another place dedicated to soft playing for kids. Several toilets have also been added adjacent to the aforementioned playground.
To the southeastern part of the village, the pond has been cleared and some woods have been removed to make way for the new boating lake and a café. Last but not least, in the southwest, a football-pitch-sized picnic area has been erected to serve the needs of the locals.
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 82
- The graph shows data about the average Saturday sales of two bakeries in London in 2010 78
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 73
- Maps show the changes of the lakeside 2000 2009 95
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ected to serve the needs of the locals.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1054.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99526066351 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96258953054 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60663507109 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2354321463 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.4 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111565815313 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470200574094 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788633439551 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915504880188 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0958345506493 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.