The Marlton Gallery before and after it was renovated.
The maps illustrate the layout of the Marlton Gallery before and after its renovation.
Overall, it is clear that the gallery apparently increased in size with new functional rooms after their renovation. It previously comprised of 2 floors and the rooftop garden, before being innovated to the building with 3 floors and the parking lot.
Looking at the diagrams more closely, one can see that the roof garden was replaced by the education centre and the media room, with the elevator extended on the second floor. Furthermore, the special exhibition, which was beneath the coffee shop, was moved to the second floor to extend their area. Also, the parking lot was constructed on the first floor, on the right-hand side of the lift. Besides, the front desk was split into the coat room and the front desk, which are lies between the stairs and the lift. Eventually, the gift shop before and after the gallery renovation haven’t changed its location, except the decrease in size to create a zone for stairs construction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-16 | Tôn Nguyễn Hồng Phúc | 84 | view |
- The number of public transit passengers from 1989 to 2009 and bus tram passenger numbers between 2000 and 2008 in Mel 78
- changes in student enrollment by degree at a university in Canada in 1980 and 2000
- The reasons people in Great Britain had for visiting art museums in the years 1990 and 2000 73
- the information about government expenditure in five sectors relating to domestic policy in Germany Italy and the United Kingdom in 2009 56
- The usage of oil in four different countries between 1966 and 2006 as a percentage of total energy use within each nation 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, first, furthermore, if, look, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97093023256 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53613021412 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616279069767 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.4997351683 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.875 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337758543636 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136028741185 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111057588429 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248355246541 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101640551509 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.