The number of public transit passengers from 1989 to 2009 and bus & tram passenger numbers between 2000 and 2008 in Mel
The line graphs illustrate the ridership for public transit between 1989 and 2009 and the passenger data from 2000 to 2008 in the bus and tram services.
Looking at the first graph, one can see that the public transit usage significantly increased, almost doubled to peak at 500 million from 1989 to 2009. Particularly, the passengers had scarcely changed during the first 5 years, before shot up dramatically during the last period.
In the second graph, it is apparent that there was an increase in the number of passengers, but the bus passengers were dominant. Bus usage remained relatively over the first 3 years, then surge considerably from closely 120 million to reach at approximately 230 million in 2008. Meanwhile, the bus adoption remained from 2000 to 2002, then abruptly peak at closely 160 million in 2004, before dip steadily to reach the point as it was at the beginning. Eventually, there was an apparent speeding up in the tram passengers over the pan of the last period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-01 | Tôn Nguyễn Hồng Phúc | 78 | view |
- The Marlton Gallery before and after it was renovated 84
- The diagrams show the life cycle of an insect called the cicada 92
- The number of public transit passengers from 1989 to 2009 and bus tram passenger numbers between 2000 and 2008 in Mel 78
- the information about the economic value of international students in the US in 2005 2010 and 2015 The bar graph shows changes in the number of international students from 3 countries in two of those years 73
- the proportion of workers in three different sectors in South Korea between 1981 and 2011 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, second, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92261904762 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72646988587 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559523809524 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.5321307135 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 118.142857143 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360396573942 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166100928302 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140837468739 0.0843802449381 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280907617538 0.15604864568 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151404582232 0.0819641961636 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.