The number of British visitors to the US and American visitors to the UK from 2011 to 2015 / The amount spent by those visitors in that period.
The first graph shows the number of British tourists to the US and American tourists to the UK between 2011 and 2015.
According to the first graph, it is clear that the UK tourists to US was always higher than the number of US visitors to UK and two nations both have their own fluctuation in the number of visitors over the pan of 4 years. In the US from 2011 to 2013, there was a decrease by approximately 5 million people from the UK tourist. Then from 2013 to the end of the period, British’s visitors went up gradually and peaked at 3.5 million in 2015. While UK tourists dip in 2012, US tourists vice versa had a slight increase to almost 3 million people then it significantly hit a low of 2.5 million in a following year. During the last 2 years, there was an increase trend was seen in the number of US visitors to reach the highest point of approximately 3.2 million people.
In the second graph, it is apparent that there was a gap between the spent by the UK tourists and that from the US tourists. From the beginning of the period to 4 years later, the gap had narrowed, especially from nearly $1million to approximately $2million. There was always an increase pattern in the amount spent by the UK, went up almost double from the start year of the period to reach the highest point at nearly 6$ million in 2015. In contrast, there was an up and down in the amount of expense by the US tourists from the first 3 years, then during the last period, it steadily grew to $4 million in 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-27 | Tôn Nguyễn Hồng Phúc | 67 | view |
- The number of British visitors to the US and American visitors to the UK from 2011 to 2015 The amount spent by those visitors in that period 67
- changes in student enrollment by degree at a university in Canada in 1980 and 2000
- The usage of oil in four different countries between 1966 and 2006 as a percentage of total energy use within each nation 84
- the population of Chile by age group between 1975 and 2035 79
- Information about management positions held by women in a European country in 2006 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ap had narrowed, especially from nearly million to approximately million. There was alw...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ly from nearly million to approximately million. There was always an increase pattern i...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$6'.
Suggestion: $6
...od to reach the highest point at nearly 6$ million in 2015. In contrast, there was...
^^
Line 3, column 590, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing the last period, it steadily grew to million in 2015.
^^
Line 3, column 592, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...g the last period, it steadily grew to million in 2015.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 33.7804878049 175% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1219.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 282.0 196.424390244 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.32269503546 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44033731582 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.404255319149 0.547539520022 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.4716788438 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.9 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375777109378 0.215688989381 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172888852744 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764895557679 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267034653296 0.15604864568 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561912272247 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 76.9 61.2550243902 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.07 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.82 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.