the proportion of profits made from the seven most viewed movie gerne in US cinemas in 1995,2000, and 2005 as a percentage of the total earnings of the US film industry for each year
The bar graph illustrates the percentage of movie’s profits from 7 different most popular genres in US cinemas in 1995,2000 and 2005.
Overall, it is clear that Drama and Comedy was the 2 most popular movie genres in 7 kinds of that mentioned in the graph. While the audiences interested in Comedy increased during 3 years, Drama suffered the significant decrease at the same period. The similar pattern was seen with Action and Animation, with the percentage of profits made from Animation went up, whilst with that made from the action movie went down. Furthermore, there were some fluctuations in the earnings of the other kinds of film types.
Looking at the graph more closely, one can see that in 1995, Drama stayed at the first spot at approximately 30% of profits of US film industry, which made a significant gap with others. For 5 years later, the profits had scarcely changed except the fact that Comedy surpassed Drama to reach the highest earnings at 25% in 2000 and still kept that position over the pan of 5 years with an increase in total profits by closely 5% up. At the same time, Adventure genre shoot up swiftly to closely 25%, which make Adventure as the second most popular viewed in the US film industry. In contrast, Drama dip steadily during the period, stood at just a half of their profit in 1995. Over the course of 3 years, there were the similar trends with thriller and musicals which made their profits just went up in 2000 at nearly 10% and then dip a low in the next 5 years by almost a half, whilst Animation constantly almost doubled when compare their profit at 2000 with the year of 1995.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-20 | Selena17_ | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-23 | Nguyên-MTTN | 84 | view |
| 2022-03-15 | bodoiqua@04 | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | phạm khánh linh | 90 | view |
| 2021-07-29 | Tôn Nguyễn Hồng Phúc | 75 | view |
- the process of plastic bottle production 73
- The reasons people in Great Britain had for visiting art museums in the years 1990 and 2000 73
- changes in student enrollment by degree at a university in Canada in 1980 and 2000
- The number of public transit passengers from 1989 to 2009 and bus tram passenger numbers between 2000 and 2008 in Mel 78
- the information about the economic value of international students in the US in 2005 2010 and 2015 The bar graph shows changes in the number of international students from 3 countries in two of those years 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 880, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...w in the next 5 years by almost a half. While Animation constantly almost doubled whe...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, look, second, so, still, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 33.7804878049 172% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 965.302439024 139% => OK
No of words: 290.0 196.424390244 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63448275862 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40773624321 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 106.607317073 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513793103448 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 392.4 283.868780488 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6803797247 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.181818182 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301709515736 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120353556451 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0947120943272 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24911636425 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103266277487 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 880, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...w in the next 5 years by almost a half. While Animation constantly almost doubled whe...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, look, second, so, still, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 33.7804878049 172% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 965.302439024 139% => OK
No of words: 290.0 196.424390244 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63448275862 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40773624321 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 106.607317073 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513793103448 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 392.4 283.868780488 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6803797247 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.181818182 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301709515736 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120353556451 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0947120943272 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24911636425 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103266277487 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.