Information about management positions held by women in a European country in 2006.
The table illustrates the rate of women who is responsible for the management roles in different industries in European country in 2006.
Overall, the rate of management positions held by women in hospitality industry was much more higher than that in other jobs sector. Meanwhile, the Manufacturing contained the fewest proportion of management roles in the women workforce.
Looking at the table more closely, one can see that in Hospitality, the Managers stood as dominant among that in three remained industries, particularly at 33.14 percent in 2006. Followed by CEOs and Executives at 20.6 and 19.9 percent respectively. In contrast, the occupation which had the fewest percentage of high positions women workforce in this country was Manufacturing, it is evidence as Manager’s roles was 9 percent, made a huge gap between it and the other positions in the same industry which just stood at under 2 percent. There was a similar downtrend pattern in the proportion of management roles held by women in Finance and IT, which the managers responsibilities stood out as the highest rate. Interestingly, the rate of managers in Finance made a gap of approximate 16 percent with that in the CEOs positions, and quadrupled the rate of Executives which value was at 4.58 percent. Eventually, in IT industry, there was 6.58 percent of women who held the CEOs roles and 12.82 percent of its in Executive position.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-09 | Tôn Nguyễn Hồng Phúc | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | JayV109 | 75 | view |
- changes in student enrollment by degree at a university in Canada in 1980 and 2000
- The developments along Olive Drive before and after the construction of new facilities between 1980 and 2010 73
- the proportion of profits made from the seven most viewed movie gerne in US cinemas in 1995 2000 and 2005 as a percentage of the total earnings of the US film industry for each year 75
- the proportion of workers in three different sectors in South Korea between 1981 and 2011 72
- The number of public transit passengers from 1989 to 2009 and bus tram passenger numbers between 2000 and 2008 in Mel 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 90, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
... women in hospitality industry was much more higher than that in other jobs sector. Meanwhi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 121, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'jobs'' or 'job's'?
Suggestion: jobs'; job's
...was much more higher than that in other jobs sector. Meanwhile, the Manufacturing co...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1185.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12987012987 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0857208448 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489177489177 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 371.7 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6230898765 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.666666667 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267996102067 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128129606158 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853213090071 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233154912667 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479721581308 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.