Milk production
The table compares the amount of milk produced yearly in four nations in 1990, 2000 and 2010.
Overall, there was an upward trend in milk production in Tanzania and Guatemala, while the opposite was true for Australia. In addition, the Netherlands was the most prominent milk market despite a minor fluctuation during the research period.
In 1990, the Netherlands produced the most milk, with 11,262,000 litres, followed by Australia - the second largest market, with 11,246,000 litres. A decade later, the amount of milk manufactured in the Netherlands slightly decreased to 11,155,000 litres, but later climbed to 11,466,000 litres in 2010. Australia still ranked second in the chart although its data consistently fell to 9,165,000 litres in 2010.
Of the remaining countries, Tanzania came in third with 87,000 litres in 1990, far higher than Guatemala, at 26,000 litres. From 1990 onwards, the quantity of milk made in Tanzania dramatically grew to 1,55,000 litres in 2010. Likewise, 2000 and 2010 witnessed increases in milk production in Guatemala, climbing to 55,000 litres and 84,000 litres, consecutively.
- The charts below give information about the price of tickets on one airline between Sydney and Melbourne Australia over a two week period in 2013 67
- Milk production 78
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree Provide relevant examples if necessary 61
- Big salary is more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree 56
- A big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...,262,000 litres, followed by Australia - the second largest market, with 11,246,0...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, likewise, second, still, third, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51445086705 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84851148915 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583815028902 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.5245967063 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230819479782 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11310308193 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844250682446 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158143786543 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661941436143 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.