In the modern world, it is possible to shop, work and communicate online and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a positive or negative development?
It is true that in contemporary life, people in many parts of the world are able to do their shopping, work, and communicate with each other via the internet. While there are clear positive aspects of this trend, there are also negative aspects of having less face-to-face contact with other people.
On the one hand, the internet can be very handy in many ways.
Many people use it to keep in touch with friends and family, using Facebook, Skype, or WhatsApp to send instant messages or to enjoy a quick chat. Many also use the internet for online shopping, thus saving time and petrol on trips to the supermarket as well as hunting around different sites for bargains.
However, it is in terms of work that the internet offers the most potential benefits. More and more people are working or even studying from home, at hours which suit their own schedules. Many hours are saved each week by eliminating the daily commute and the stress of coping with the rush hour.
On the other hand, as social beings, people need personal contact. Firstly, virtual friendships that are formed online may not be genuine. The media carries many horror stories of youngsters who have fallen prey to paedophiles, for example. Secondly, online shopping is not always appropriate, depending on the item. It is best, for instance, to try on clothes before buying, and while a bookworm can find almost any book title that they want online, they will certainly miss browsing the shelves of bookstores. Finally, personal interaction with work colleagues can generate ideas and avoid misunderstandings.
In conclusion, although there are positive aspects of this trend, there are also aspects of face-to-face contact, which it would be a shame to lose.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-28 | EnglishUSA_uz | 56 | view |
- A friend has invited you to a party but you will not be able to attend Write to your friend In your letter Tell your friend you can t come Explain why you are unable to attend Arrange another time to meet 90
- Some people believe that graduates of middle school have to continue studing at higher education school But another types of people s think on the contrary 56
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they ratedthe hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate online and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 56
- The charts below show the level of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 ang 1990 42
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 965.302439024 150% => OK
No of words: 291.0 196.424390244 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97250859107 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60492886603 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 106.607317073 163% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59793814433 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 283.868780488 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3030391813 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4666666667 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5333333333 5.23603664747 220% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259420575088 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754193258772 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845079543998 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124265891273 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118404598063 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 40.7170731707 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.