The number of tourists visiting Malaysia and Dubai from 1995 to 2003 is presented below.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown in the diagrams below.
Write at least 150 words.
The supplied line chart illustrates the information on travellers visiting Malaysia and Dubai between 1995 and 2003. At the first glance, the figure for Dubai significantly experienced an upward trend, whereas that of Malaysia declined after witnessing slight fluctuations. Remarkably, though starting at the lowest position of the chart, Dubai’s statistics eventually reached its peak by the end of the period.
Getting back to the details, in 1995, around 100 thousands tourists went to Malaysia, it was approximately two times higher than its was in Dubai (well under 50 thousasnds). Afterwards, from 1996 to 2000, the amounts of holidaymakers in Malaysia rapidly climbed up to over 250 thousands. While that of Dubai observed a fluctuation in the same period and finally reached to the number of around 250 thousands.
Considerably, the quantities of those who pay a visit to both these two places went up to over 300 thousands from 2000 to 2001. Before 2002, the number of travellers spending time visisting Malaysia always hold the first position, however, in 2002, there was the decrease in both two places, and it was over 300 thousands and well under 300 thousands in Dubai and Malaysia successively and the highest position was over taken by Dubai. At the end of the period, in 2003, Dubai rocketed to reach to 400 thousands visitors, however, that of Malaysia continued falling down to just under 250 thousands.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-07-21 | sannacoconutandmango | 78 | view |
2020-03-04 | tronghuy230903 | 84 | view |
2018-11-03 | Audric | 56 | view |
2018-08-07 | eyraen | 71 | view |
- The three pies chart below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparions where relevant 78
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 73
- The pie chart below show the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these main causes affected three regions of the world during 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 78
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Percentage of national consumer expenditure by category 2002 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, well, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1198.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16379310345 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86128663487 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556034482759 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7086990083 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.111111111 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7777777778 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177304547335 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833075196736 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441562148131 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129994556393 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344867173683 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.