Oil consumption by major consumers.
The line graph shows daily oil consumption by the US, Western Europe, Japan, China, and the Middle East over a period of four years, starting from 2015.
It is noticeable that the US was by far the biggest oil consumers throughout the period shown. In addition, while there was a downward trend in oil consumption by the US and Western Europe, and Japan, the opposite trend was recorded in the figure for China and the Middle East.
In 2009, the US consumed 10 million barrels of oil on a daily basis, which was five times higher than the data for China and the Middle East. The figure for Western and Japan stood at 4 million in 2009, which experienced a fall of 1 million to 3 million barrels 3 years later. By contrast, there was an increase in oil consumption by Western Europe and Japan, and the Middle East, with the figures rising to 3 and 2,2 million barrels in 2012, respectively.
Between 2012 and 2019, a steady climb to reach a peak of 3 million was witnessed in the amount of oil consumed by the Middle East. China’s oil consumption peaked at 3.7 million in 2015, which then fell to 3.2 million at the end of the period. The data for China saw the most dramatic change, with the number of barrels consumed fluctuating around 10 million in the first three years before a dramatic fall of 6 million was witnessed in the year 2019.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-08 | Guri473812 | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-03 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-10 | dinhthu05 | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-29 | dejoyce89 | 84 | view |
| 2020-09-14 | hoakim | 67 | view |
- The line graph below shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city by gender 85
- Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student s performance Continual assessment such as course work and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- Oil use of major consumers 77
- Differences between countries become less evident each year Nowadays all over the world people share the same fashions advertising brands eating habits and TV channels Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantage 84
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1103.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4837398374 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40334678075 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463414634146 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.869028789 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.555555556 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215057713101 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118927956134 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554354822281 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158782299721 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300944075974 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.