people participate in 6 difference English Course in pare, 2016

Essay topics:

people participate in 6 difference English Course in pare, 2016

The table shows the information about the student who attending ielts programs in six different courses (ge, es, test,elfast,webster and warung ielts) in pare, 2016.
overall, it is clear that on ielts reading and listening programs catagories, es shared the highest number of class participant. followed by test and elfast. webster and warung ielts was on the bottom of the list with student range from 144 to 155 participant.
Moving to writing task 1 program, there was a slight difference order of the list, which was ES ranked first (157) and ge in the second place (155). Subsequently, warung ielts and webster were on two last place with 150 and 138 students respectively.
Furthermore, in writing task 2 program, webster ranked first (147), followed by three different courses, - warung ielts, es and elfast- at the same level (146). On contrary, ge and es were less interested courses for this program, with similar number of class participant (145).
Despite the variation number of student among the programs, it seems that ge and es were two most popular places for learning IELTS material such as reading, listening and writing task 1 programs. While webster was the most favorite course for acquiring knowledge about writing task 2.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-11-10 lhm.ils 75 view
2019-12-16 Arman Mansyur 67 view
2019-12-16 Jesslynindah 42 view
2019-12-13 Arman Mansyur 67 view
2019-12-13 Arman Mansyur 84 view
Essays by user wardiati :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , elfast
...ms in six different courses ge, es, test,elfast,webster and warung ielts in pare, 2016....
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 96, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Followed
...he highest number of class participant. followed by test and elfast. webster and warung ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 125, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Webster
...rticipant. followed by test and elfast. webster and warung ielts was on the bottom of t...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 32, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'program' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'programs'.
Suggestion: programs
...tively. Furthermore, in writing task 2 program, webster ranked first 147, followed by ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to read'.
Suggestion: to read
...ere two most popular place for learning reading, listening and writing task 1 programs....
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, regarding, second, while, in the second place

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 985.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10362694301 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78133267645 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575129533679 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.183613246 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114143491149 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451963410218 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609956124458 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0730805619191 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707492739795 0.0819641961636 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.