Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002 2006 and 2010

The bar chart illustrates the proportion of British men, women and children who follow the recommendation of the amount of fruit and vegetable absorbed on a daily basis every 4 years from 2002 to 2010.

Overall, people in 2006 were prone to follow the advice more as the percentage of children and each gender consumption was higher compared to statistics of 2002 and 2010. Additionally, women tended to follow the diet recommended and children do exactly the opposite.

It is noticeable that the percentage of women consumed according to the recommendation was always higher. In 2002, the figure was 25%, compared to 22% and 11% men and children. In 2006, the figure rose to 32%, which was also higher than 26% and 18% for men and children. Similarly, in 2010, although the figure dropped to 26%, it remained higher than the percentage of men and children who follow the advice (24% and 16% respectively).

Moreover, people eat recommended in 2006 more than in the two other years. The figure for men, women and children all went up from 22% to 26%, 25% to 32% and 11% to 18% respectively. However, in 2010, there was a total decrease, which was 24%, 26% and 16% of men, women and children consuming alike the advice.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...06 were prone to follow the advice more as the percentage of children and each gen...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, moreover, similarly, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1014.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78301886792 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72491308107 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490566037736 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5167436103 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.4 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266446280875 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114061732956 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897055999542 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187060481848 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783083781962 0.0819641961636 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.