The pictures illustrate the innovations of the Nature Museum from 2010 to 2013.
The pictures illustrate the innovations of the Nature Museum from 2010 to 2013.
Over the period, this area witnessed dramatic changes, with the addition of a new area and the size adjusting in the ocean hall and former mammal area. These modifications are to improve visitors’ experience quality.
The ocean hall after five years had been expanded, while the original mammal area shrunk and converted to the ground for the ice age and insect displays. It is also noticeable that the layouts for dinosaurs and the lobby hall remained untouched after the renovation.
Meanwhile, the map in 2013 showed a new multipurpose area in the east. With the mammal display being moved to the north of this area, the observation for visitors located in the northeast provides people with the best observation experience. Added in the southwest corner was a new shop, and next to it was where people can have coffee.
- Some people believe women are better leaders than men To which extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The diagram shows a process of making a storage area from a material called concrete canvas 61
- Fewer young people choose to work in farming What are the reasons Should young people be encouraged to do farming work 67
- The chart below shows the depth of snow cm in a particular ski resort in Canada in three individual years 73
- Today children and teenagers are committing more crimes Why is this case How should they be punished 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 765.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03289473684 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65873325752 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618421052632 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5014204283 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.625 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171846923947 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133430380962 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.328275652496 0.0843802449381 389% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256436630721 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.429425168434 0.0819641961636 524% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.