The pie chart below show global Internet users’ favorite social media platforms from 2011 to 2013.
The pie chart gives information about social media platforms which were loved by people used the Internet over the world over 3-year period, staring from 2010.
Overall, it can be seen that the figure for Facebook is the highest in this period. Besides, all social media channel were more preferred from 2011 to 2013, except Facebook.
The proportion of Inter users who loved Facebook in 2011 stood at 59%, which is triple than that for Twitter. But this number witnessed a significant decrease of 21% to 38% in 2013. 21% of people used the Internet considered Twitter as favorite media channel, which twice as high as that for Linkedln, with 10% in 2011. Later then, there was a slight increase in Twitter’s figure to 25% in 2013. The period between 2011 and 2013 experienced a moderate growth in the figure for Linkedln from 10% to 15%.
Google+ and Pinterest had the similar figure for users, at 5% each in 2011. Over the next 2 years saw a significant rise in Google+ to 14% in 2013. In contrast, this figure for Pinterest only slightly grew by 3%.
- Many business meetings and discussions are happening online nowadays.Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- The chart below shows the annual pay (thousands of US dollars) for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2007. 73
- TOPIC: Participation by 5 to 14-year-old in selected leisure activities (Australia) 56
- The diagram shows the consumption of renewable energy in the USA from 1949-2008. 78
- Goods transported in UK (1974-2002). 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Later than'?
Suggestion: Later than
...as that for Linkedln, with 10% in 2011. Later then, there was a slight increase in Twitter...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...t for Linkedln, with 10% in 2011. Later then, there was a slight increase in Twitter...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, so, then, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74731182796 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42854288768 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60752688172 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7543025886 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.2727272727 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9090909091 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54545454545 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268651290857 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924058582912 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756598676858 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156295271273 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694737692565 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.