The pie chart below shows the devices people in the 18 to 25 age group use to watch television in a European country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The given diagrams illustrate six types of devices that young people used to watch television in one European country between 2007 and 2017. A quick overview of the chart reveals that in 2007, youngsters used conventional TV the most while 10 years later this kind of media accounted for the least proportion.
Looking at details, the percentage of conventional TV which young people used to watch TV made up the highest proportion, at 34% of the total. The figure for laptop and desktop followed by 20% and 28% respectively. Standing at 15% of mobile phone used to review television higher than 8% of flat-screen TV. Meanwhile, only 5% of the tablet were used to watch TV by the people who fell into the 18 to 25 aged group.
By 2017, the proportion of conventional TV decreased rapidly to 4%, hence, the flat-screen TV became the most popular device (27%) was used by teenagers throughout the time surveyed. The figure for mobile phone and tablet rose significantly while the figure for laptop witnessed a slow fall of around 8%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-23 | Trinh Phuong | 84 | view |
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which maybe unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- In some countries most people prefer to rent their homes rather than buying them What are the advantages and disadvantages of renting a home 67
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female study in every subject Do you agree or disagree 56
- The chart below shows information about the use of public transportation in one country by age group and location of the residents in 2016 80
- some cities have few controls on the design and construction of housing and office building People think that they are free to choose the design they like Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantage 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...top witnessed a slow fall of around 8%.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, look, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80898876404 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74067493118 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601123595506 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9106001094 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173199031121 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811899134184 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813814358848 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117459438709 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603382681098 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.