University students always focus on one specialist subject, but some people think universities should encourage their students to study a range of subjects in addition to their own subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, tertiary students tend to concentrate on one major subject whilst some people think that students should be encouraged to participate in other subjects. I strongly agree with this opinion because the students will easily fall in stress when they focus on one subject and in some cases, they will choose to drop out.
The primary reason for my belief is that undergraduates may have a sense of strain with an intensive curriculum. In many universities, students are always under pressure for many examinations to make the grade. As a consequence, those nerve-racking moments may spoil their interest in the subject and from time to time students will fall behind with their studies or in some situations, students may choose to drop out of college to find other ambitions. In addition, students should take part in other subjects to have more skills to support their major. For example, music subjects help students enhance their creativity which is needed for the main subject.
Another reason for my belief is that the more subjects students study, the more jobs opportunities they have. In each subject, students will be able to learn different skills which are very useful for their job prospects. Furthermore, real life enables students to put the knowledge and skills gained during their studies into practice, it may help them adapt in a flexible way with many professionals in society. In the long-term, it is the vital key to move up the career ladder. Moreover, studying a range of subjects helps students discover their strengths and weaknesses, since they can make an accurate decision about their future.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that students should have motivation from universities because of the development of their careers. It is recommended that universities should organize some short courses for students so that they could single out their suitable curriculum.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-18 | Trinh Phuong | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-14 | Nodirjon | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | mrizkil | 89 | view |
| 2019-06-26 | AigerimSakenova | 56 | view |
| 2019-04-07 | zh.shuvo | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that everyone has a right to access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write 67
- University students always focus on one specialist subject but some people think universities should encourage their students to study a range of subjects in addition to their own subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- the charts below show the proportion of income spent on different areas by one university in 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 94
- the diagram below shows the design for a wave machine and its location 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a flexible way" with adverb for "flexible"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...s into practice, it may help them adapt in a flexible way with many professionals in society. In ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ities should organize some short courses for students so that they could single o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19093851133 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76277996825 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546925566343 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0549286084 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.571428571 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422959595605 0.244688304435 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154181748505 0.084324248473 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084982319051 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270098830391 0.151304729494 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240444581925 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.