University students always focus on one specialist subject, but some people think universities
should encourage their students to study a range of subjects in addition to their own subject. To what
extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that students in university are now placing much attention on the subjects related to their own future career. However, some critics argue that universities should resort to some measures to have their students study more diverse subjects. Studying more subjects makes students become more mature to some extent, yet I believe that it is legitimate for them to merely focus on their major subjects.
On the one hand, learning more subjects bring people more knowledge and a well-rounded perspective of life. It is undeniable that many subjects in the tertiary curriculum are very important in practical terms. For example, History teaches young generations about how their ancestors fought against outside intruders and made sacrifices to protect their motherland and the sovereignty of their nations. Therefore, this subject fosters a sense of patriotism for the students.
However, the intense syllabus of universities often makes students feel overwhelmed with a great amount of information to cram in.
On the other hand, in the digital era, people need to be skillful in the major they choose to pursue. It appears indisputable that studying many subjects would distract students from their specialty. Moreover, along with the information explosion, people can easily mitigate their lack of knowledge after graduating from universities. Information is now widely available on the Internet with high accuracy. Besides, encouraging students to focus on some subjects can effectively build up a strong workforce which has the ability to foster general prosperity of a nation.
In conclusion, although some people argue that students should study more subjects, I would side with those who believe it is indispensable for tertiary students to excel in one field of expertise.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-18 | Trinh Phuong | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-14 | Nodirjon | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | mrizkil | 89 | view |
| 2019-06-26 | AigerimSakenova | 56 | view |
| 2019-04-07 | zh.shuvo | 73 | view |
- University students always focus on one specialist subject but some people think universities should encourage their students to study a range of subjects in addition to their own subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Online currencies have become more common in recent years Why is this Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present Please discuss the two views and give your own opinion 78
- The growing number of overweight people is putting a strain on the health care system Some people think that the best way to deal with this problem is to introduce more physical education lessons in school curriculum To what extent do you agree or disagre 89
- The pie charts below show the percentage of five kinds of books sold by a bookseller between 1972 and 2012
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47482014388 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86104896137 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568345323741 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.048304422 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.714285714 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.418257270836 0.244688304435 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137981527668 0.084324248473 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857183051283 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213577720788 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1002006075 0.056905535591 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.