The given pie chart iiustrates the 4 major reasons of agricultural land reducing. The table gives 4 causes affected three parts of the world during the 1990s.
Overall, it can be clear that overgrazing was the biggest cause which consists 35%. The deforestation was less bigger than over-cultivation, 30 per cent and 28 per cent respectively.
However, in different regions given causes affected differently. In North America 3.3% per cent land degraded by over-cultivation while in Europe 7.7 per cent and it can be obviously that in the Oceania wasn't over-cultivation at all. Deforestation in Europe was approximately 10 per cent while in North America it was under 1 per cent.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: Bhinder Raman
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:
- The line graph shows changing patterns of business communication in New Stratford from 1980 to 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UKSummarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion on this change? Good or bad? 84
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK 78
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: LESS_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'less big'?
Suggestion: less big
...ich consists 35%. The deforestation was less bigger than over-cultivation, 30 per cent and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...it can be obviously that in the Oceania wasnt over-cultivation at all. Deforestation ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 33.7804878049 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 577.0 965.302439024 60% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 111.0 196.424390244 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1981981982 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.24586718041 3.73543355544 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35940618774 2.65546596893 127% => OK
Unique words: 69.0 106.607317073 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621621621622 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 171.0 283.868780488 60% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6923991403 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4285714286 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8571428571 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133590066957 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809215113473 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797859828378 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122174704285 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118965745138 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.