The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land become less productive. The table shows how these couses affected three regions of the world during the 1990 couses of land degradation by region?
The circular chart reveals the information about the four main causes of land degradation,and tabular chart shows three effective regions with land degradation during the year 1990.The data is calibrated in percentum.which is clearly and coherently represented
It,can be seen that,the main seveler causes of land degradation however major cause is overgrazing that effect is very harmful for land with (35%)moreover then less to overgrazing is second major reason is deforestation that chemical dimage the (30%) Part of land.after that over cultivation is third reason of land degradation over cultivation effects on (28%) of land.and (7%)are more reason of land degradation.furthermore the main reasons of land degradation are overgrazing,deforestation,over-cultivation,and other reason is (35%),(30%),(28%)however(7%) respectively.
As far as trend was concerned that three effective region with land degradation during the year 1990.firsr region was North America in that region major effect on land degradation with over cultivation however total land degraded had been (5%)An addition to this Europe was most degraded region with total (23%) land degraded,furthermore in Oceania land degraded had been deforestation,over cultivation,over grazing and total land degraded was (1.7%),(0%),(11.3%) and (13%) respectively.
Overall,it is evident that overgrazing activity is the major cause of land degraded as compare to other three Causes,and Europe was most effective region with land degrade as compare to other two region during the year 1990,
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-07-12 | mary.ssherr | 56 | view |
2023-04-06 | ililmaidatuz | 84 | view |
- The chart below about womans continue work after they have children?the chart shows four different age of group? 67
- A Country's future depends its young people there for it is after argued that government should invest heavily in its youth do you agree and disagree? 56
- The chart below about womans continue work after they have children?the chart shows four different age of group? 67
- The chart below about womans continue work after they have children?the chart shows four different age of group? 73
- The flowchart shows the process of admission for admission into university? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...the four main causes of land degradation,and tabular chart shows three effective reg...
^^^^
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...h land degradation during the year 1990.The data is calibrated in percentum.which i...
^^^
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch is clearly and coherently represented It,can be seen that,the main seveler cau...
^^^
Line 2, column 3, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , can
... clearly and coherently represented It,can be seen that,the main seveler causes of...
^^^^
Line 2, column 20, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...rently represented It,can be seen that,the main seveler causes of land degradation...
^^^^
Line 2, column 471, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , deforestation
...sons of land degradation are overgrazing,deforestation,over-cultivation,and other reason is 35...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 502, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...ergrazing,deforestation,over-cultivation,and other reason is 35%,30%,28%however7% re...
^^^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... degraded had been 5%An addition to this Europe was most degraded region with tot...
^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , furthermore
...aded region with total 23% land degraded,furthermore in Oceania land degraded had been defor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , over
...nia land degraded had been deforestation,over cultivation,over grazing and total land...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , over
... had been deforestation,over cultivation,over grazing and total land degraded was 1.7...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...,0%,11.3% and 13% respectively. Overall,it is evident that overgrazing activity is...
^^^
Line 4, column 117, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...egraded as compare to other three Causes,and Europe was most effective region with l...
^^^^
Line 4, column 197, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'region' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'regions'.
Suggestion: regions
...th land degrade as compare to other two region during the year 1990,
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, moreover, second, so, then, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 7.0 286% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1304.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90045248869 4.92477711251 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.47742072279 2.65546596893 169% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484162895928 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 394.2 283.868780488 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 8.94146341463 34% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 73.0 22.4926829268 325% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 243.852870031 43.030603864 567% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 434.666666667 112.824112599 385% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 73.6666666667 22.9334400587 321% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 18.3333333333 5.23603664747 350% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 1.69756097561 825% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33783957688 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.255350830287 0.103423049105 247% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354046046813 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239440228255 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284013631687 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 43.2 13.2329268293 326% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -19.54 61.2550243902 -32% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 20.3 6.51609756098 312% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 34.1 10.3012195122 331% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 18.12 11.4140731707 159% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.76 8.06136585366 133% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 66.0 11.4329268293 577% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 31.2 10.9970731707 284% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.