The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
The given pie chart represents the causes of land degradation and the table illustrates the percentage of total land deteriorated by these causes in three different regions during 1990s.
Overall, a higher percentage of damage to the land is usually caused by over-grazing than deforestation or over-cultivation.
From the pie chart, it can be seen that 35 % of agricultural land degrade as a result of over-grazing . Deforestation is accounted for 30 % of deterioration of cultivable land whereas over-cultivation contributes 28 % to the land degradation. All other reasons cause only minor damage to the land.
The table shows that 23 % of land in Europe become less productive during 1990s. This is the largest amount of land deteriorated among all three regions. Only 5 % of total land in North America were negatively affected by agricultural practices whereas this number is 13 % in Oceania. In Oceania over-cultivation did not damage the land at all while the major cause of why land became unproductive in this region was over-grazing.
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 78
- The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four European countries between 1990 and 1999.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1990s'.
Suggestion: during the 1990s
...these causes in three different regions during 1990s. Overall, a higher percentage of dam...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...land degrade as a result of over-grazing . Deforestation is accounted for 30 % of ...
^^
Line 7, column 68, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1990s'.
Suggestion: during the 1990s
...f land in Europe become less productive during 1990s. This is the largest amount of land det...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, whereas, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33939393939 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44603671052 2.65546596893 130% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0355962908 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8888888889 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328907187915 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146897100859 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109527494841 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203308198068 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108215836301 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.