The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart and table above illustrate the key causes of global land degradation and the distinguishing effects on 3 specific countries in the 1990s.
The first impression is that over-grazing was the most significant factor while over-cultivation was seen to account for the least proportion among the top three. Another outstanding feature is that Europeans witnessed their total land degraded the most during the 1990s.
In particular, 35% of worldwide land devaluation occurred after the appearance of over-grazing activities. Furthermore, while over-cultivation processes led to 28% of the less productive land which ranked number 3 in the group, there were also other minor elements making up 7%. On the other hand, it can be observed from the table that there was 23% of land in Europe that became less fertile. In contrast, this figure in North American countries was only 5% in total. A crucial point worth mentioning is differences in each problematic activity’s statistics compared to the world’s tendency. For instance, in the 1990s period, over-glazing activities resulted in the least figure of land degradation while this was the number one issue for the world.
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Some people believe that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime Others however argue that the circumstances of an individual crime and the motivation for committing it should always be take 84
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015 89
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your ans 84
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, so, while, for instance, in contrast, in particular, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36898395722 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1354323421 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625668449198 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4768683787 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.555555556 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1111111111 5.23603664747 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148166020302 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618963840817 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477928570872 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111730666069 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033925565306 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, so, while, for instance, in contrast, in particular, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36898395722 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1354323421 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625668449198 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4768683787 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.555555556 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1111111111 5.23603664747 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148166020302 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618963840817 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477928570872 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111730666069 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033925565306 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.