The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The pie chart illustrates the inducements of global land degradation whilst the table demonstrates impact of these causes on three continents in the 1990s.
Overall, the main reasons consist of deforestation, over-cultivation and over-grazing beside other unspecific reason. The data was collected based on analysis of three regions of the globe which were North America, Europe and Oceania.
The highest figure was over-grazing which contributed 35 percent to the given problem and the proportion was roughly one third in Oceania compared to world’s figure. Next, the worldwide deforestation’s percentage was 5 less than the biggest factor. The Old World was the leader of this cause with 7.7 percent, whereas the figure of Oceania was absolutely zero.
Over-cultivating was the final factor which brought about 28 percent to land degradation and Europe kept holding the first position with 9.8 percent outweighed the rest regions.
In summary, it was no surprise as the percentage of debasement was biggest in Europe by 23, following was North America and Oceania by 13 and 5 respectively.
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 84
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 73
- The first graph below shows the weight in tonnes of fruit produced by a farm during each month in 2013 and also the amount in tonnes of fertiliser used The second graph shows the volume of rainfall in each month in millimetres Write a report summarising t 90
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- the three charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, third, whereas, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44444444444 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1683064229 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625730994152 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6838719851 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.375 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112682346512 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585810092938 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640583836334 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0757285515224 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771602944674 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.