The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie chart illustrates the main reasons why agricultural becomes less productive. The given table illustrates how these causes affected categorised three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Overall, the percentage of over-grazing is the highest figure make worldwide land degradation while the proportion of other only occupied with a little figure. It is also worth pointing out that the percentage of over-grazing is the highest figure made land degradation in Oceania.
To begin with, the percentage of deforestation is reported at 30%, which is higher than the proportion of over-cultivation by 2%. Moreover, 7% of other is the causes of land degradation. In addition, the percentage of over-grazing is recorded at 35%.
Turning to the other set of data, the proportions of deforestation in 3 nations namely, North America, Europe and Oceania were reported at 0.2,9.8 and 1.7, respectively. Moreover, the percentage of total land degraded was recorded at about 5%, which was the lowest figure. Furthermore, the proportion of total land degraded stood at peak of around 23%, this figure was higher than the figure of Oceania by 13%.
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 67
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 73
- The society would be benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging Do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, moreover, so, while, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32786885246 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1287577067 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546448087432 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4293663505 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186136837395 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896894592168 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120084588814 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143519820494 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.178549310136 0.0819641961636 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.