The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three region of the world during the 1990s
The pie chart illustrates reason that influence productivity, while table chart gives information about degradation reason for North America, Europe and Ocean over 1990.
Overall, it is clear that The most significant cause was over - grassing, while other reasons was lower. For land degradation, the rate of Europe tend to an upward, while North America was smallest.
First of all, the percentage of over grazing was biggest by 35 percent to grade land. For deforestation and over cultivation was approximately similar, at about 30 percent and 28 percent respectively. The rate of other was lowest which was less 5 time than overgrazing.
Secondly, the most exposition continent was Europe with 23 percent that include deforestation 9.8 percent , over cultivation 7,7 percent and over grazing 5,5 percent. For the figure in the Oceania was less 10 percent compared to Europe. The total percentage of North America was most small by 5 percent that divided into 0.2 percent- deforestation. 3.5 percent- over cultivation, 1.5 percent – overgrazing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-09 | Bholo | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-28 | Ariuntungalag | 11 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agriculture land becomes less productive. the table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990 . 22
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purpose in six areas of the world. 67
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three region of the world during the 1990s 11
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices .To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 61
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purpose in six areas of the world. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 46, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the biggest'.
Suggestion: was the biggest
... of all, the percentage of over grazing was biggest by 35 percent to grade land. For defore...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ate of other was lowest which was less 5 time than overgrazing. Secondly, the m...
^^
Line 4, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e than overgrazing. Secondly, the most exposition continent was Europe with ...
^^
Line 4, column 31, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...razing. Secondly, the most exposition continent was Europe with 23 percent t...
^^
Line 4, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...econdly, the most exposition continent was Europe with 23 percent that include...
^^
Line 4, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly, the most exposition continent was Europe with 23 percent that include defo...
^^
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t that include deforestation 9.8 percent , over cultivation 7,7 percent and over g...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38787878788 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01227960042 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593939393939 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9947293543 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.9 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0618257301759 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0322200202193 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407530714734 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0583356463942 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050615374333 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.