The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
The two charts respectively illustrate four causes of worldwide land degradation and the situations of land degradation in three sampled areas in 1990. Overall, it is clear that over-grazing and deforestation were the main reasons for the global land degradation and Europe suffered from the most severe land problem.
Starting with the pie chart, there were four factors that caused the international agricultural land degradation. Among the four reasons, over-grazing played the most important role, accounting for35%. Deforestation and over-cultivation occupied the similar proportion (30% and 28% respectively). However, other reasons had the smallest proportion, at only 7%.
Turning now to the table about the land degradation in three regions, Europe underwent the largest degraded area, at 23%, followed by Oceania, at 13%. North America had the smallest degraded land, with only 5%. In Europe, deforestation affected the biggest land, occupying 9.8%, while overgrazing the smallest area(5.5%). In Oceania, over-grazing was the most significant reason for land degradation, which formed 11.3%, but over-cultivation played no role. In North America, the biggest contributor to degradation was over-cultivation, at 3.3%; by contrast, the smallest one was deforestation(0.2%).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-29 | Frank Chen | 78 | view |
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others,however,believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 78
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 67
- it is generally acknowledged that families now are not as close as they used to be. What are some possible reasons for this and what can be done to reverse the trend? 73
- some people argue that teaching children of different abilities together benefits all of them. Others believe that intelligent children should be taught separately and given special treatment. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 457, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...%, but over-cultivation played no role. In North America, the biggest contributor ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1093.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.90810810811 4.92477711251 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43638419038 2.65546596893 129% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605405405405 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7087051743 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3636363636 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8181818182 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.45454545455 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146105561852 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612452944071 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544306552103 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112287226544 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295805338294 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.7 11.4140731707 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.