The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agriculture land becomes less productive.the table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990
The circular chart reveals the four main causes of land degradation, and the tabular chart illustrates the affected degraded land in three different regions during the year of 1990. The data given in percentum.it is a clear and coherent representation.
It can be seen that there are several causes of worldwide land degradation. However, the main average of overgrazing 35%.furthermore, the causes of less production land that is over cultivation 28%, overgrazing 35% and deforestation 30%, other 7% respectively.
As far as trend considered that was three different nation . The highest average of deforestation had increased in Europe nation. After that the average of over cultivation was decreased 7.7% in Europe nation. In addition to that was the average of cultivation had been increased 8.8%.overgrazing had been decreased 5.5% the total degraded 23% in Europe respectively.
Overall,it is evident that over grazing activity is the major causes of land degradation. In main causes compare to other three main causes effective the land degradation. The main causes of deforestation in Europe nation as a compare to deforestation had been decreased in Oceania nation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-24 | Komalchahal | 67 | view |
| 2018-06-22 | Baljitkaurdhaliwal | 56 | view |
| 2016-12-23 | mfuzail1991 | 61 | view |
| 2016-12-23 | mfuzail1991 | 61 | view |
| 2016-02-24 | nikynadia | 60 | view |
- The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009. 56
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agriculture land becomes less productive.the table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990 67
- The flowchart shows the process of admission for admission into university 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 261, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...forestation 30%, other 7% respectively. As far as trend considered that was three ...
^^^
Line 3, column 53, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'nation' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'nations'.
Suggestion: nations
...end considered that was three different nation . The highest average of deforestation ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nsidered that was three different nation . The highest average of deforestation ha...
^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...station had increased in Europe nation. After that the average of over cultivation wa...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...ded 23% in Europe respectively. Overall,it is evident that over grazing activity i...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46703296703 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32080418756 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467032967033 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6081191883 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4545454545 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5454545455 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180500576542 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750749326542 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903807228382 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131282911477 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844785220515 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.