The pie chart compares figures for visitors to four categories of tourist
attraction and to five different theme parks in Britain in 1999.
It is clear that theme parks and museums / galleries were the two most
popular types of tourist attraction in that year. Blackpool Pleasure Beach
received by far the highest proportion of visitors in the theme park sector.
Looking at the information in more detail, we can see that 38% of the
surveyed visitors went to a theme park, and 37% of them went to a
museum or gallery. By contrast, historic houses and monuments were
visited by only 16% of the sample, while wildlife parks and zoos were the
least popular of the four types of tourist attraction, with only 9% of visitors.
In the theme park sector, almost half of the people surveyed (47%) had
been to Blackpool Pleasure Beach. Alton Towers was the second most
popular amusement park, with 17% of the sample, followed by
Pleasureland in Southport, with 16%. Finally, Chessington World of
Adventures and Legoland Windsor had each welcomed 10% of the
surveyed visitors.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
- The pie chart below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in UK in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The chart below show the number of working hoirs per week in industrial sector in four European countries in 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons with relevant 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activities in 2010 67
- The pie chart below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in UK in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, look, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04419889503 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57671219175 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580110497238 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8156309854 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.125 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 15.0 3.83414634146 391% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0442026113846 0.215688989381 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.022327166945 0.103423049105 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392552229828 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0161562728702 0.15604864568 10% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325121434386 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.