The pie chart illustrates the proportion of energy consumed by the different application applications in an average Australian home in general the pie chart shows the temperature control both for heating and cooling is the major user for water heating and the table shows that energy consumed per capita drops as household size increase heating and cooling devices account for almost 40% of Total energy and water heating consumes a quarter of total household but other applications such as dishwasher television and smaller items make up 60% of energy consumption slightly less than a half amount is used for both left left fridges lighting and standby power comprises A Remarkable 3% compared with the stoves oven and other cooking equipment that expand only 4% of household energy the table shows that a single person electricity usage is 5000 to 6500 KW per annum whereas two people use a similar amount or not much more at 3% Australian household typically uses about the same as do people or perhaps upto 10000 KW 6 people or more living in a same house have only double the construction of a few two person household in summary all form of heating and cooling air temperature water freezes and cooking are the major consumers of energy in Australian house and it is more economically to live in a large household
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger. Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- The graph below shows the weekday volume of passenger activity on the Toronto Metro system for July 2007Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Differences between countries become less evident each year Nowadays all over the world people share the same fashions advertising brands eating habits and TV channels what are the advantage and disadvantages of this 73
- The graph below shows the weekday volume of passenger activity on the Toronto Metro system for July 2007Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 616, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: left
...ess than a half amount is used for both left left fridges lighting and standby power comp...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 705, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'stoves'' or 'stove's'?
Suggestion: stoves'; stove's
...rises A Remarkable 3% compared with the stoves oven and other cooking equipment that e...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, whereas, in general, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1095.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86666666667 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67664798665 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 225.0 22.4926829268 1000% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1095.0 112.824112599 971% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 225.0 22.9334400587 981% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 53.0 5.23603664747 1012% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236946796578 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.236946796578 0.103423049105 229% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236946796578 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 114.0 13.2329268293 861% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -156.9 61.2550243902 -256% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 91.0 10.3012195122 883% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.45 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 18.09 8.06136585366 224% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 11.4329268293 499% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 92.0 10.9970731707 837% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 92.0 11.0658536585 831% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.