The pie chart show the destination of export goods in three countries in 2010
The diagram representate the aim of coming-out commodity in Argentina, Mexico, and Chile in 2010. It is explained in percentage. Overall, it can be seen in Argentina and Chile, the highly number had been taken by other latin america while USA had the lowest percentage for these two countries. On the other side, in Mexico, USA had around three-quarter of the chart whereas the remaining percentage was divided into three aqual parts. According to the Argentina’s data, other latin america had the greatly number exactly 38%. In the same way, 26% had been obtained by europe. At the lower place, others stood in 20% and the nethermost of destination from Argentina was USA as big as 16%. Next to, Mexico had the huge amount for USA which had dominated circa three-quarter of the diagram certainly 82%. Following with that, the last three parts had the aqual percentages each 6%. Then in Chile, other latin america had the highest data which no more and no less 31% percentage while europe had 1% less than it, surely 30%. The percentage of 22% was caused by others the aim of export stuff from Chile. The final part, USA had 18% from the all data in Chile’s coming-out commodity.
- The pie chart show the destination of export goods in three countries in 2010 56
- Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the two graphs below about the highest level of education of women in someland in 1945 and 1995 78
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- you have just an article in a national newspaper which claims that town centres in your country all look very similar to each other you don t fully agree with this opinion 70
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, whereas, while, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7756097561 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58671846807 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580487804878 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3258921156 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5833333333 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0833333333 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.08333333333 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0759706322692 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.032051080075 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381444365362 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0759706322692 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.