The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children’s charity located in the USA spent and received in 2016.
The pie charts show how a children’s charity in the United States collected and spent its funds over the course of a year. The first chart is divided into six different revenue sources, while the second is divided into three different expenditure purposes.
Overall, it is clear that the foundation obtained the majority of its funds from donated food. On the other hand, it spent the majority of its funds on program services.
To begin, 86.6 percent of revenue for this children’s charity came from donated food in a year, which is more than eight times as much as community contributions (10.4 percent). These two income sources accounted for exactly 97 percent of total income. Furthermore, more than 2% of income was lost.
At the same time, the charity had to spend nearly 96 percent of its budget on program services. The remaining 4.2 percent of expenditures were for fundraising, with the remainder going to management and general purposes. It is worth noting that the total income was $53,561,580, which was just enough to cover the expenditures of $53,224,896. By the end of the year, the charity had saved just over $330,000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-22 | Mabel Nguyenn | 78 | view |
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in 2016 78
- The chart below shows the number of girls per 100 boys enrolled in different levels of school education 67
- The pie charts illustrate the proportion of water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... To begin, 86.6 percent of revenue for this children’s charity came from donated fo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.953125 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65037647188 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578125 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9666971765 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4545454545 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4545454545 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128530065791 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485008903316 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804601221115 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0780160711298 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708480136788 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.