The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie diagrams display the percentage of revenue resources and the expenditures of a children's charity organization in the USA in 2016. Overall, the highest source of income was from donated food while the most of the income was spent to arrange program services.
The charity income mainly generated fr six different categories. The donated food contributed the majority of revenue source, which accounted for 86.6%. Similarly, there were almost 95% of amount used for charity program services. The other categories were much smaller. The second largest income source was from the community contributions which was composed of 10.4% of total income, which almost five fold that of revenue generated from program.
However, investment and government grants contributed almost same proportion of money to the charity, that was merely 0.2%, compared to 0.4% of other resources. Expenditure of fundraising and management and general categories was 2.6% and 1.6% respectively.
In conclusion, although the USA's charity foundation received total of 53561580 dollars as revenue sources, it saves an amount of approximately $300000 in 2016.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | Shivam7090 | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | SNEHA S.R | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | Aron | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | Aron | 11 | view |
| 2019-07-27 | Szprawstyle | 78 | view |
- Governments make many rules to protect people from danger for example by making people wear seat belts in cars or not allowing smoking in public places However many people believe that there are too many rules nowadays To what extent do you agree with thi 88
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. While others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- Table 11
- Most developed countries spend a large proportion of their health budgeys on expensive medical technology and procedures. This money should be spent instead on health education to keep people well. To what extent do you agree with this 61
- The bar diagram below shows the number of houses per year in 2 cities, Derby and Nottingham between 2000 and 2009. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, similarly, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60693641618 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8960864368 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589595375723 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7525999227 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11944528719 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509473277925 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596069277579 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.081932533124 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493928229763 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.