the pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year.

Essay topics:

the pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year.

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 16pt;">The first pie graph illustrates the total percentage of revenue sources, while the second</span>
</p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:16.0pt;line-height:115%">pie graph shows the percentage of expenses of a certain children charity in USA
in year 2016.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 16pt;">It is clear that the highest source of donation came from donated food, whereas the least</span>
</p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:16.0pt;line-height:115%">source came from Investment income and government grants. The charity spent
mostly in their program services.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 16pt;">To start with, the highest supply for the charity came as donated food which was more</span>
</p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:16.0pt;line-height:115%">than 86% of the total earning, while one-tenth of the revenue sources came from
community contributions. The remaining 3% account was managed through program revenue, investment income, government grants and other income. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 16pt;">On the contrary, they spent almost 96% in their program services and only a small</span> <span style="font-size: 16pt;">percentage accounted for fundraising and management and general at 2.6% and</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:16.0pt;line-height:115%">1.6% respectively. The charity earned exactly $53,561,580 this year and used up
$53,224,896.&nbsp; The remaining amount was just over 330,000 dollars<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal">

</p>

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-06-30 akva 78 view
2019-06-30 akva 56 view
2019-04-17 www.www 61 view
2019-02-27 utkarshshahi 78 view
2019-01-20 smrm 78 view
Essays by user akva :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so, whereas, while, on the contrary, to start with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 965.302439024 176% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 9.48603351955 4.92477711251 193% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 10.5239356913 2.65546596893 396% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631284916201 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 283.868780488 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.3 1.45097560976 159% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 206.252854526 43.030603864 479% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 339.6 112.824112599 301% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 35.8 22.9334400587 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.0 5.23603664747 267% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 8.0 3.83414634146 209% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0509148579432 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038681123133 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030659292137 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0404920726284 0.15604864568 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344030598406 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 41.2 13.2329268293 311% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -23.27 61.2550243902 -38% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 6.51609756098 244% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 25.2 10.3012195122 245% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 38.35 11.4140731707 336% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.06136585366 127% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 32.5 11.4329268293 284% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.