The pie chart shows the change of annual spending by local authorities in someland in 1980, 1990and 2000
The pie graphs illustrate the variation model about the level of yearly expense for various fields by regional government in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000.
As can be seen from the charts, it is clear evident that patterns of diversity domains' spending varied in the time frame. While the amount used for environmental services witnessed an upward trend, other fields tended to decline. Additionally, both of the percent payment for higher education, transportation and health and human resources were constant changed.
In 1980, the allocation of budget for higher education and health and human resources accounted for 35% and 14% respectively. These figures went up to 45% and 20% in 1980 before having a downward trend in 2000, equivalent to 40% and 10%. Unlike these domains, the proportion of expenditure on transportation was 16% in 1980, then it only had 6% left in 1990 and dramatically climbed to 22% at the end of the period.
In the early stage, the environmental services took for 4% of the total local budget. This number gradually raise to 9% at the end of the studies time. An opposite trend that can be observed from the charts is the percentage of K12-education’s and other fields' fee that were paid by authorities. These costs fall from 25% and 6% to 18% and 1% relatively, marked the decrease in the amount of outlay for them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-10 | LinhCandy2801 | 89 | view |
- The pie chart shows the change of annual spending by local authorities in someland in 1980, 1990and 2000 89
- Strick teaching matter from parents leading to radical actions from children can be settled by more flexible technique like bargaining. What is your view point? 56
- The line graph showa the population growth in China, India, and the United States from 1950 to 2000 84
- The line chart shows the population growth in China, India, and the United States from 1950 to 2000 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 52, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...phs illustrate the variation model about the level of yearly expense for various ...
^^
Line 7, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ved from the charts is the percentage of K12-education's and other fields fe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1133.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92608695652 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94097253824 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4869569727 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.36363636364 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117553512457 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0400374063135 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453802826045 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0770247955743 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524822526391 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.