The pie chart shows the percentage of persons arrested in the five years ending 1994 and the bar chart shows the most recent reasons for arrest
The pie chart illustrates the proportion of males and females arrested in five years ending 1994, whereas the bar chart describes the percentage of the reasons why people were incarcerated.
Overall, it can be seen that the males were more arrested than females. The majority of arrests were due to public drinking.
According to the pie chart, the percentage of women who were imprisoned was just only 9%, compared to over 90% of females innocent. Meanwhile, the figure for males who were captured by the police was nearly four times as much as females, at 32%, while 68% of them were not incarcerated.
Moving onto the bar graph, the most common reason for imprisonment is public drinking, with around 31% of men and 38% of women. Another common reason is drinking driving, but the figure for men is nearly doubling the women, at 26% and 14%, respectively. In the meantime, the percentage of both males and females who are apprehended is small, only approximately 4% and 7%. The causes of recent arrests that have not been mentioned, namely breach of order, assault, theft, and other reason accounted for similar proportions, ranging from nearly 12% to under 20%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96446700508 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65930748656 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61421319797 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6673734746 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.666666667 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299448518238 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117436224807 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11683428218 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195193629905 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140806875546 0.0819641961636 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.