The pie charts show the percentage of persons arrested in the five years ending 1994 and the bar chart shows the most recent reasons for arrest
The pie charts give information about the number of males and females who are arrested from 1989 to 1994. The bar chart illustrates the various reasons for arrest.
Overall, man arrested more than women in 1994. Public drinking was the most common reason for the arrests, while no answer accounted for the lowest reason.
4 times male more than females are arrested in 1994, at 32% and 9% respectively. The percentage of women did not arrest was over 20% more than men.
Public drinking was the main reason for recent arrests, women outlooked men at 38% was the highest number on the chart compared to 31% for men. 10% more males than females were arrested for drinking and driving, at over 25% and nearly 15% respectively. Breach of order, theft, and other reason are reasons for arresting more men than women, between 16% to 18%. The proportion of assault accounted for the same in both sexes, at about 17%. In more than 5% of arrests, females did not have an answer, and 9% of men.
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the silkworm 78
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced 79
- 04 08 2016 In many countries people now wear Western clothes suits jeans rather than traditional clothing Why Is this a positive or negative development 84
- The plan below shows the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now 78
- 12 03 2022 Fewer people do farming work in rural areas WHy Should young people be encouraged to do farming work 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 813.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64571428571 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31217540469 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531428571429 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0759568255 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.9090909091 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9090909091 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.36363636364 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 1.13902439024 790% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283215887058 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135540126825 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0959449126175 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218276925684 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0927288660214 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.