The pie charts above compare figures of the population age of Yemen and Italy in the year 2000 and estimations on those statistics in 2050.
It is clear from the graphs that the people of the between 15 and 59 in the two countries account for a large proportion of the total population, and are also showing opposite approach. However, the other two age groups seem to have rather similar variations.
In 2000, the ratio of the people aged between 0 and 14 was 3.6% in Yemen, along with which was 24.1% in Italy. As for those aged from 15 to 59, half Yemen’s population belonged to this group, but the ones in Italy only accounted for 14.3% the total community. A high proportion of both countries consisted of the retirement-age group, with 46.3 % the population in Yemen in 2000, and 61.6% in Italy.
The upcoming 50 years is expected to see the rather high rise in the 15 to 59 aged people in Yemen to 57%, but that same proportion in Italy, however, is predicted to drop to 46.2%. Those at retirement age is likely to increase by 2.2% in Yemen, or even double in Italy, while the other group age is thought to go down to 37 and 11.5 in Yemen and Italy respectively.
The pie charts above compare figures of the population age of Yemen and Italy in the year 2000 and estimations on those statistics in 2050.
It is clear from the graphs that the people of the between 15 and 59 in the two countries account for a large proportion of the total population, and are also showing opposite approach. However, the other two age groups seem to have rather similar variations.
In 2000, the ratio of the people aged between 0 and 14 was 3.6% in Yemen, along with which was 24.1% in Italy. As for those aged from 15 to 59, half Yemen’s population belonged to this group, but the ones in Italy only accounted for 14.3% the total community. A high proportion of both countries consisted of the retirement-age group, with 46.3 % the population in Yemen in 2000, and 61.6% in Italy.
The upcoming 50 years is expected to see the rather high rise in the 15 to 59 aged people in Yemen to 57%, but that same proportion in Italy, however, is predicted to drop to 46.2%. Those at retirement age is likely to increase by 2.2% in Yemen, or even double in Italy, while the other group age is thought to go down to 37 and 11.5 in Yemen and Italy respectively.
- The line graph above demonstrates the quantity of waste released by three businesses A, B and C over fifteen years from 2000 to 2015.It’s easy to see that the three above bear little to no resemblance in the fluctuation of waste produced in tonnes.In th 89
- It is clear that there’s extreme contrary in the variations of the two values over the first decade of the 21st century. While more and more money was spent on cell phone service, landline phone, on the other hand, shows a tendency of steady decrease.Th 78
- The line graph compares three companies about the term of their waste output from 2000 to 2011 It is clear that there were remarkable changes in waste output produced by all three companies as shown in the graph While companies A and B saw a decrease in w 67
- The given graph illustrates how much waste is created by three companies over the course of 15 years beginning at 2000.Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that both companies A and B witnessed the downward trend of waste output over 15-year pe 67
- In 1930, 75% of the labour force in the USA was employed in farming, fishing and foresting whileonly 10% worked in sales and office and trade. At the same time both the Industrial sector and thetechnical sector constituted just 2% of the workforce each. T 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44907407407 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55458367803 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532407407407 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.0135110466 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.125 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.515747440322 0.215688989381 239% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.22814416287 0.103423049105 221% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162918812194 0.0843802449381 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.344776921767 0.15604864568 221% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151832706884 0.0819641961636 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.