The three pie charts above compare differences in yearly expenditure by a Britain school between 3 years.
It is clear from the charts that they used most of the money for the teacher’s salaries and the smallest portion that they paid for was all kinds of insurances.
Teacher’s salaries were the main thing that the school spent their money for with the percentage fluctuated between 40% and 50% in 3 years. In particular, the peak of money proportion that the school paid for teachers was 50% by 1991 and the lowest was in 1981. For buying furniture and equipment, they used 15% of the money in 1981 while spending 10% lower by 1991 but surprisingly invested up to 23% by 2001.
Books resources money accounted for 15% total spending and was the same proportion as the furniture and equipment’s at the same time by 1981 then it went up to 20% in 1991 but fell significantly to 9% by 2001. The portion of other another worker’s salaries decreased continuously over those 3 years that was 28% in 1981 and went down to 22% in 1991 and ended up with 15% in 2001. Insurance comprised the least portion of all with a mere 2% or 3% in 1981 and 1991 while increased slightly to 8% by 2001.
The three pie charts above compare differences in yearly expenditure by a Britain school between 3 years.
It is clear from the charts that they used most of the money for the teacher’s salaries and the smallest portion that they paid for was all kinds of insurances.
Teacher’s salaries were the main thing that the school spent their money for with the percentage fluctuated between 40% and 50% in 3 years. In particular, the peak of money proportion that the school paid for teachers was 50% by 1991 and the lowest was in 1981. For buying furniture and equipment, they used 15% of the money in 1981 while spending 10% lower by 1991 but surprisingly invested up to 23% by 2001.
Books resources money accounted for 15% total spending and was the same proportion as the furniture and equipment’s at the same time by 1981 then it went up to 20% in 1991 but fell significantly to 9% by 2001. The portion of other another worker’s salaries decreased continuously over those 3 years that was 28% in 1981 and went down to 22% in 1991 and ended up with 15% in 2001. Insurance comprised the least portion of all with a mere 2% or 3% in 1981 and 1991 while increased slightly to 8% by 2001.
- The line graph compares the average price of abarrel of oil with the food price index over aperiod of 11 years.It is clear that average global prices of both oil andfood rose considerably between 2000 and 2011.Furthermore, the trends for both commoditiesw 56
- The pie charts above depict the median ages of Yemeni and Italian citizens in 2000 and predictions in 2050.It is well-defined from the charts that kids, teenagers and adults under 60 years old account for most of Yemen’s population both in 2000 and 2050 73
- The line graph above illustrates variations in the average prices of food and oil on a global scale in 11 years from 2000 to 2011.Overall, there’re striking similarities in the way two values change through over one decade, which show the clearest diff 73
- The pie graphs above show the different amount of water used for residential needs, industrial and agricultural purposes in San Diego, California and the World. It is clear that the water usage in the three places is generally different. In San Diego and 67
- The first line graph shows the average monthly spending on children’s sports by their parents from 2008 to 2014 while the second one presents the amount of children participating in football, athletics and swimming in the UK at the same time.It is clear 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 991.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58796296296 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79485107981 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.750715641 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.875 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.506307363962 0.215688989381 235% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.242094834751 0.103423049105 234% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.209294682636 0.0843802449381 248% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.391039965912 0.15604864568 251% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.212377534584 0.0819641961636 259% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 77.91 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.