The line chart above gives information on the figure for British city workers travelling every day to work with the three common kinds of transport from 1970 to 2030.
It is clear from the graph that the quickly rising number of people who want and will go to work by car and by train is quite similar. In contrast, the pattern of bus travelers tends to decrease slowly.
In 1970, the amount of commuters travelling by car, bus and train was 2, 4 and 5 million respectively. After 10 years, only bus commuters remained exactly the 1970’s a number while the others increased insignificantly. Over a period of 20 years, approximate 7 million people drove car to work when there were just 3 million caught train to work, although both the pattern of car and train grew considerably in 2000. However, the number of people who traveled by bus kept slowly fall at the same time.
At 2015, both amounts of bus and train travelers reached about 3.5 million with a fast jump of the train and a keep-going slight drop off the bus. Between 2015 and 2030, experts predict that the number of car and train commuters will keep climb up without a fall. Particularly, train’s pattern will go straight up and reach a peak of about 5 million people, whereas there will be up to 9 million car travelers. On the other hand, there will be less and less people go to work by bus, which is coming down to the level of 3 million in 2030.
The line chart above gives information on the figure for British city workers travelling every day to work with the three common kinds of transport from 1970 to 2030.
It is clear from the graph that the quickly rising number of people who want and will go to work by car and by train is quite similar. In contrast, the pattern of bus travelers tends to decrease slowly.
In 1970, the amount of commuters travelling by car, bus and train was 2, 4 and 5 million respectively. After 10 years, only bus commuters remained exactly the 1970’s a number while the others increased insignificantly. Over a period of 20 years, approximate 7 million people drove car to work when there were just 3 million caught train to work, although both the pattern of car and train grew considerably in 2000. However, the number of people who traveled by bus kept slowly fall at the same time.
At 2015, both amounts of bus and train travelers reached about 3.5 million with a fast jump of the train and a keep-going slight drop off the bus. Between 2015 and 2030, experts predict that the number of car and train commuters will keep climb up without a fall. Particularly, train’s pattern will go straight up and reach a peak of about 5 million people, whereas there will be up to 9 million car travelers. On the other hand, there will be less and less people go to work by bus, which is coming down to the level of 3 million in 2030.
- The line graph compares the average price of a barrel of oil with the food price index over a period of 11 years.It is clear that average global prices of both oil and food rose considerably between 2000 and 2011. Furthermore, the trends for both commodit 67
- The first line graph shows the average monthly spending on children s sports by their parents from 2008 to 2014 while the second one presents the amount of children participating in football athletics and swimming in the UK at the same time It is clear fr 82
- The table above compares the percentage of children with different educational problems in school A and school B in 2005 and 2015.It is clear from the table that the total percentage of students who were lack of educational abilities of school B was small 67
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 67
- The pie charts above give a percentage about water consumption in San Diego County, California and the rest of the world. It is clear from the chart that both San Diego and California consume the most water for residential demand while global population u 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The line chart above gives information on the figure f...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 507, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... bus kept slowly fall at the same time. At 2015, both amounts of bus and train t...
^^^
Line 4, column 459, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... the other hand, there will be less and less people go to work by bus, which is comi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1170.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 259.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51737451737 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53218868711 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544401544402 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.029385539 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.363636364 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5454545455 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353953525093 0.215688989381 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153254808074 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.202306060137 0.0843802449381 240% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.315086435609 0.15604864568 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.249177452013 0.0819641961636 304% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.